Can uncertainty justify overlapping policy instruments to mitigate emissions ?
Can uncertainty justify overlapping policy instruments to mitigate emissions ? / Oskar Lecuyer & Philippe Quirion. Paris : CIRED, December 2012 ( DT/WP No 2012-43 )
http://www.centre-cired.fr/spip.php?article1466
This article constitutes a new contribution to the analysis of overlapping instruments to cover the same emission sources. Using both an analytical and a numerical model, we show that when the risk that the CO2 price drops to zero and the political unavailability of a CO2 tax (at least in the European Union) are taken into account, it can be socially optimal to implement an additional instrument encouraging the reduction of emissions, for instance a renewable energy subsidy.
Our analysis has both a practical and a theoretical purpose. It aims at giving economic insight to policymakers in a context of increased uncertainty concerning the future stringency of the European Emission Trading Scheme. It also gives another rationale for the use of several instruments to cover the same emission sources, and shows the importance of accounting for corner solutions in the definition of the optimal policy mix. (© CIRED)
Highlights :
- We develop an analytical and a numerical model of the EU energy and carbon markets.
- We add uncertainty on energy demand and focus on instruments for emission reduction.
- We analyze the economic implications of a risk that the CO2 price drops to zero.
- We show that it can be socially optimal to add an instrument to the EU-ETS.
OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
Danièle Revel (14 décembre 2012). Can uncertainty justify overlapping policy instruments to mitigate emissions ? Veille énergie climat. Consulté le 22 janvier 2025 à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/oa1c
