Ressources numériques en sciences humaines et sociales OpenEdition Nos plateformes OpenEdition Books OpenEdition Journals Hypothèses Calenda Bibliothèques OpenEdition Freemium Suivez-nous

Comparative analysis of five case studies: commonalities and differences in approaches to mitigation actions in five developing countries

Comparative analysis of five case studies: commonalities and differences in approaches to mitigation actions in five developing countries / Jose Alberto Garibaldi, Harald Winkler, Emilio Lebre la Rovere, Angela Cadena,Rodrigo Palma, José Eduardo Sanhueza, Emily Tyler & Marta Torres Gunfaus, Climate and Development, Published online 8 Jul 2013.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17565529.2013.812031#.UfYrbRaTafQ

Authors’s abstract :

In light of the ongoing international discussions about the Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action concept, this study takes instead a more ‘bottom-up’ approach through a comparative analysis of five studies of mitigation actions in Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Peru and South Africa. The analysis shows that mitigation actions are driven by both developmental and climate objectives. The character, scope, policy horizon and potential success of an action are closely linked to the developmental path of countries such that mitigation actions that directly address poverty and development seem to have a better chance of being implemented since they address issues higher on the policy agenda of developing countries. Where international support is sought, all five countries have some existing measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) and technical competence capacity that can be built upon. The choice of mitigation actions is evidently linked to institutional capacity (both for design and implementation of mitigation actions and possible MRV), emissions profile and the relative resource endowments of countries. The policy environments – from highly planned to less coordinated – and time-horizons – from 4-year plans to 40-year scenarios – differ substantially between the countries. Thus, the comparative analysis underscores the diversity of possible mitigation actions and capabilities and the concomitant need for flexibility in definition, design and implementation.


OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
Danièle Revel (3 septembre 2013). Comparative analysis of five case studies: commonalities and differences in approaches to mitigation actions in five developing countries. Veille énergie climat. Consulté le 12 septembre 2024 à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/oajg


Vous aimerez aussi...

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les indésirables. En savoir plus sur comment les données de vos commentaires sont utilisées.