Policy-instrument choice and benefit estimates for climate-change policy in the United States / Matthew J. Kotchen, Kevin J. Boyle, Anthony A. Leiserowitz. NBER, October 2011 (working paper ; 17539)
This paper provides the first willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates in support of a national climate-change policy that are comparable with the costs of actual legislative efforts in the U.S. Congress. Based on a survey of 2,034 American adults, we find that households are, on average, willing to pay between $79 and $89 per year in support of reducing domestic greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions 17 percent by 2020. Even very conservative estimates yield an average WTP at or above $60 per year. Taking advantage of randomized treatments within the survey valuation question, we find that mean WTP does not vary substantially among the policy instruments of a cap-and-trade program, a carbon tax, or a GHG regulation. But there are differences in the sociodemographic characteristics of those willing to pay across policy instruments. Greater education always increases WTP. Older individuals have a lower WTP for a carbon tax and a GHG regulation, while greater household income increases WTP for these same two policy instruments. Republicans, along with those indicating no political party affiliation, have a significantly lower WTP regardless of the policy instrument. But many of these differences are no longer evident after controlling for respondent opinions about whether global warming is actually happening.
Citer ce billet
Danièle Revel (2011, 2 novembre). Policy-instrument choice and benefit estimates for climate-change policy in the United States. Veille énergie climat. Consulté le 25 février 2024, à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/o98i