Pipeline Power
Pipeline Power / Franz Hubert & Onur Cobanli, Wien : FIW, May 2012, 27 p. (FIW Working Paper N° 93)
http://www.fiw.ac.at/fileadmin/Documents/Publikationen/Working_Paper/N_093-HubertCobanli.pdf
We use cooperative game theory to analyze the strategic impact of three controversial pipeline projects. Two of them, Nord Stream and South Stream, allow Russian gas to bypass transit countries, Ukraine and Belarus. Nord Stream’s strategic value turns out to be huge, justifying the high investment cost for Germany and Russia. The additional leverage obtained through South Stream, in contrast, appears small. The third project, Nabucco, aims at diversifying Europe’s gas imports by accessing producers in Middle East and Central Asia. The project has a large potential to curtail Russia’s power, but the benefits accrue mainly to Turkey, while the gains for the EU are negligible. (© FIW)
OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
Danièle Revel (7 juin 2012). Pipeline Power. Veille énergie climat. Consulté le 18 février 2025 à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/o9pu